I am distracted this week and talk about the need to take defense within a certain period of time for potential customers, especially those who are suing lawsuits. I do not think that we must face the problem of recurrence of people who think they can become their lawyers with complex legal problems. Designing a person who does not dream of doing surgery on his own, preparing a house, preparing complex tax returns, etc. can not judge that a lawyer does not need a lawyer or hire a lawyer It is not something to be aware of. They believe that the court system protects their interests and holds them warmly when they are involved in the lawsuit. Normally, what happens is that you should look for a lawyer if you sue over repair or lose the case. It is difficult if not impossible to find a lawyer at that time, it is impossible for a lawyer to help, and if you find a lawyer it can cost more than it is necessary to pay Initially
Two examples of real estate are shown below.
1) I wanted to transfer the house of my mother who passed away to her and my sister, so a woman called me. She was mentioned to me by the service she received through her work and she was given a discount on the fee. She signed the phone saying that she could not hire a lawyer so she was returning to receive free legal services for the second time. First of all, she may not have been honest when she purchased the service for the first time, as she does not have the right to receive free legal services unless she is learning a very small amount. Secondly, the advice she got from free legal work was minimal and led her to a court who received incomplete information from the clerk rather than a lawyer. At the moment she does not advertise real estate, but she does not have real estate appraisal, she does not investigate security interests and judgment, and knows what else. Also, even if she hires a non-lawyer to write a testimony for her, if her or her sister dies, you die with leaving others as partners of the surviving spouse and child Consideration of what will happen is probably not taken into consideration. Did I want to pull my hair after talking to her? Yes, I did. If she takes time and is not paying what is being done right now, many times her paid to a lawyer will be the cost that will certainly be a disaster in future production I guess. No.
Two years ago a woman called me because she was hiring a real estate broker (not a lawyer - a person who needs a lawyer) two years ago. That co-owner of her and some friends owned the residence and the carriage house. People at Carriage House had never tried splitting the property with rezoned. Now, many years later, the people of the horse-drawn carriage moved to another house and filed a lawsuit in the court seeking a division of property to the judge. The woman who called me was spending the time trying to get a secured loan of property. She blew me away when she told her that she was unable to receive the loan as I was advancing in relation to property during the lawsuit. She said she had to decide what to do. I called to tell you that unless you want to take lawsuits on the basis of contingent fees or percentage, you can not hire a lawyer. What percentage? She considers that her property is worth $ 500,000, and if there is controversy over the value of her property she has the risk of moving and there is a risk of losing a considerable amount. She thinks she is going to the court and tells the judge what he wants to do when the other party has a lawyer and the judge agrees. No way!
Please, people, legal institutions are often badly complicated and should be practiced by lawyers. Do not try yourself the legal system or manipulate it yourself. Especially especially if you are already sued as a defenders.
